Pesky facts again.

SteinwayTransitCorp

Well-known member

DAVID BLACKMON: Europe’s EV Market Collapse Provides A Lesson For UAW Leadership​

Daily Caller News Foundation
DAVID BLACKMON: Europe’s EV Market Collapse Provides A Lesson For UAW Leadership

Daily Caller News Foundation

It is an ill-kept secret of American politics that most of the big labor unions in the country have long been client organizations of the Democratic Party. In presidential election years, endorsements from these unions for the party’s nominee have generally been foregone conclusions regardless of voting attitudes of rank-and-file union members.

Some are quicker to endorse than others. Vice President Kamala Harris barely had time to buy campaign letterhead before the United Auto Workers (UAW) weighed in on July 31 with its endorsement. The union’s bosses made the move despite the reality of the Biden-Harris electric vehicle mandates placing many of that union’s jobs at risk as the companies they work for lose billions each year on quixotic efforts to force the public to enjoy paying premiums for cars they cannot rely upon when the going gets tough.

Even with that early move, the UAW fell 9 days behind the AFL-CIO, which jumped on the Harris bandwagon so quickly it probably made union members’ heads spin. Hey, speed matters when your business model relies on constantly asking for favors and protections from the federal government, for which the Democratic Party has traditionally been the most fertile ground to plow.

Given that reality, the Teamsters Union made big news this week by endorsing — well, no one — despite overwhelming support among the rank-and-file for the Republican candidate, former President Donald Trump. It was the first time the Teamsters had failed to endorse the Democrat in a race since 1996, and only the second time in the union’s existence. Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien spoke at the Republican convention in July — and was snubbed by the Democrats at their convention in return. So, the refusal to endorse Harris was not a huge surprise. But O’Brien, fully aware of the vindictive nature of the Democrats towards their political enemies, apparently decided it would not be politically prudent to give a full-throated endorsement to the candidate his members so obviously prefer.

With the race shaping up to be another nail-biter, it remains to be seen whether any of these major unions’ decisions will prove to be wise. But for the UAW, the move to endorse Harris comes with increasing risk amid a softening market for the EVs being forced on U.S. consumers and the rising challenge by Chinese EV makers to the hegemony of domestic car companies in the U.S. market.

With legacy automakers like Ford and General Motors already bleeding billions of dollars in losses in their EV divisions despite heavy government subsidies in place, they can ill-afford an incursion into the U.S. market from Chinese carmakers who are able to make and sell quality EVs for far less than American car companies can. Right now, Europe is providing an object lesson about what happens in the EV space when governments allow that to happen.

EU countries were slow to move to protect their domestic car manufacturers when Chinese companies like BYD began to flood the European market with EVs. EV buyers in countries like Germany and France eagerly bought up the Chinese cars, saving thousands of Euros per unit in the process. When the EU belatedly moved to impose import tariffs on Chinese cars, the domestic car companies responded by raising prices for their own EVs in an effort to recover losses.

The result has been entirely predictable: EV sales in Germany collapsed by nearly 70% during the month of August. In France, they plunged by 33%. Clearly the appetite among EU car buyers for EVs is extremely price sensitive (no one could have possibly seen that coming), and consumers are more than happy to go back to buying gas-powered cars as cheaper alternatives.

Now, the climate alarmist central planners at the EU are proposing to respond to those uncooperative buyers by imposing massive fines on car makers for continuing to sell them the gas-powered cars they actually want to buy. Because, of course, that would be the response from power-mad apparatchiks.

Given that the Biden-Harris regime has basically followed the EU’s model on EV regulation, the EU’s struggles provide a preview of coming attractions for the U.S. auto market under a Harris presidency. It is hard to believe this is the future the UAW leadership really desires for its members.

David Blackmon is an energy writer and consultant based in Texas. He spent 40 years in the oil and gas business, where he specialized in public policy and communications.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Featured Image: Screen Capture/CSPAN


All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
 

spARTacus

Well-known member
It's fairly relevant to the situation.

There's been many attempts at arguing that the world can't move away from fossil fuels because it won't make a difference if China and other countries don't also do the same. And, that EVs are too expensive. And, that EVs aren't practical enough for range and time it takes to "refill the tank". For some aspects about EVs, China seems to be able offer leading glimpses as to how those could be overcome (cheaper EVs, reasonably quick battery swapping, lots of folks in China now using EVs). Also, there have previously been lots of suggestions that whatever can come to the market for consumers to decide to buy, for their purchasing decisions to sentence what products, ideas or companies live or die, should be left to run its course. For some aspects, that was taking a course (folks deciding to buy Chinese EVs, obviously at the detriment of sales to non-Chinese interests) and some folks will now also wonder if the counter strategy reveals that interests to save the planet take a back seat to western interests of money greed or interests to simply not let the Chinese prosper or contribute to saving the planet (and then more infighting about such, with the Chinese just sitting back and continuing to point out that the west is more of a threat to the planet than anyone else). Pick what you want to view about the situation, but there's lots of ways to look at it that overlay right in line with what your Admiral friend earlier said.
 
Last edited:

SteinwayTransitCorp

Well-known member
It's fairly relevant to the situation.

There's been many attempts at arguing that the world can't move away from fossil fuels because it won't make a difference if China and other countries don't also do the same. And, that EVs are too expensive. And, that EVs aren't practical enough for range and time it takes to "refill the tank". For some aspects about EVs, China seems to be able offer leading glimpses as to how those could be overcome (cheaper EVs, reasonably quick battery swapping, lots of folks in China now using EVs). Also, there have previously been lots of suggestions that whatever can come to the market for consumers to decide to buy, for their purchasing decisions to sentence what products, ideas or companies live or die, should be left to run its course. For some aspects, that was taking a course (folks deciding to buy Chinese EVs, obviously at the detriment of sales to non-Chinese interests) and some folks will now also wonder if the counter strategy reveals that interests to save the planet take a back seat to western interests of money greed or interests to simply not let the Chinese prosper or contribute to saving the planet (and then more infighting about such, with the Chinese just sitting back and continuing to point out that the west is more of a threat to the planet than anyone else). Pick what you want to view about the situation, but there's lots of ways to look at it that overlay right in line with what your Admiral friend earlier said.
Nope sorry, ahh saving the planet. From who? Oh that’s right from poor people who want to be middle class. Let them eat cake……..lmao
 

spARTacus

Well-known member
Are you going to enlighten us as to what particular fact you thought was pesky and why? Or, maybe just plan to continue to do do some more shameless cut and pasting from other people's thoughts with no your value added content?
 

SteinwayTransitCorp

Well-known member
Newsflash, dear the planet was completely frozen at one point then again it was completely tropical at one point which one are we worried about. Oh that’s right let’s spend billions and trillions of dollars on nothing plan to rob steal. and the idiot class lines up for it.
 

spARTacus

Well-known member
Newsflash, dear the planet was completely frozen at one point then again it was completely tropical at one point which one are we worried about. Oh that’s right let’s spend billions and trillions of dollars on nothing plan to rob steal. and the idiot class lines up for it.
So the pesky facts you want to express about are actually somewhere else, nothing to do with that article you copied and pasted?
 

spARTacus

Well-known member
Once again…..poof I guess too much dinosaur farts last time…….lol Then it must’ve been too many cocktails gave us an ice age…lol
My guess is you're suffering side effects of sniffing too many farts from the collection of yourself and the others you hang out with as you all sit back and sip on cocktails and eat your cake while proclaiming righteousness for others and your way of viewing things. That would certainly explain some pesky details.
 

SteinwayTransitCorp

Well-known member
My guess is you're suffering side effects of sniffing too many farts from the collection of yourself and the others you hang out with as you all sit back and sip on cocktails and eat your cake while proclaiming righteousness for others and your way of viewing things. That would certainly explain some pesky details.
The word fool comes to mind…….-lease feel free to line up and surrender your freedom and wealth to the god of climate. People who cannot predict the weather 4 days out. Yet tell us with certainty the weather years in advance…….lmao.
 

spARTacus

Well-known member
The word fool comes to mind……. ....People who cannot predict the weather 4 days out. Yet tell us with certainty the weather years in advance…….lmao.
Fool indeed does come to mind, for after all of what we've discussed on that subject for you to still be suggesting that weather forecasting has anything to do with climate change analysis. You really need to get your stories straighter. My advice to you, go ask a ship captain about it, since they know about it from weather forecasting at sea.
 

spARTacus

Well-known member
The word fool comes to mind…….-lease feel free to line up and surrender your freedom and wealth to...
Fool indeed does come to mind, for what entitlements you've come to enjoy that you think of as rights and for what you're not willing to consider slightly adjusting now, in comparison to what you would rather sentence for your next of kin and their next of kin to have to otherwise endure with no choice and as passed on from their ancestors. Have you ever had an honest discussion with them about it? Or, I guess this is what it all comes down to isn't it, all about wanting to have and keep for oneself for the now and present, no consideration for others or the future?
 

SteinwayTransitCorp

Well-known member
Fool indeed does come to mind, for what entitlements you've come to enjoy that you think of as rights and for what you're not willing to consider slightly adjusting now, in comparison to what you would rather sentence for your next of kin and their next of kin to have to otherwise endure with no choice and as passed on from their ancestors. Have you ever had an honest discussion with them about it? Or, I guess this is what it all comes down to isn't it, all about wanting to have and keep for oneself for the now and present, no consideration for others or the future?
I am going to give you the perfect example that is now taking place why this whole thing is a BS story. The Bill Gates organization has been in the forefront of anti-nuclear protests. But all of a sudden, Microsoft needs huge amounts of electricity for their AI computers. Now the same people who are against nuclear power want to restart shuttered nuclear power plants they want to buy 3 mile island. Remember this is about them. The environment has nothing to do with it, smarten up world . Electricity for me not for thee.
 
Top